26 Jan 2006

Wallace and Sclater and de Candolle, oh my

It has only been relatively recently that we've come to understand the way the Earth is configured. While biogeography might seem like a sleepy, off course subject, i argue that it is, along with genetics and quantum physics, one of the most exciting topics progressing in modern science. There is still so much to be learned: why do species migrate and behave this way? What are the patterns of species diversity and distribution - in the ocean? At different scales? There has been a lot written about these topics, but there is a lot that is yet to be discovered. And if we are to ultimately live in a way where we do less harm to wild nature, we need to know the answers to these questions - we need to know how we can minimize our impact and construct systems that benefit the entire world.

I am exploring a very basic question: what is the goal of conservation? Are we trying to get to some equilibrium in nature? Why should we do this - is equilibrium the correct goal?

If you have thoughts about it, do tell.
Until later - i'll be lost in thought.

No comments: